Most roundups in this category are written by one of the vendors in them, including this one. The way to make that useful rather than worthless is to be checkable: every claim about another product below links to that vendor's own published page, and every one was read on 1 September 2026.
Where a vendor does not publish something, this says "not published" rather than "No". An absence of a published claim is not evidence a product lacks a capability — it means you should ask them, not that we should guess.
Two products commonly listed in comparisons like this are absent, and the reason is worth stating:
leaselens.ai has no DNS record, leaselens.com is an unrelated parked domain, and its parent Zuva has repositioned to sell-side M&A diligence without listing LeaseLens on its own lease-management page. What circulates about it survives only as search-index residue.yardi.com URL returned HTTP 403 behind a bot challenge. The widely-repeated claim that it requires Voyager is unsourced, so it is not repeated here.| Crevanta | Prophia | Cactus | MRI Contract Intelligence | V7 Go | Blooma | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary focus | Underwriting and valuation | Verified lease record | AI underwriting | Enterprise contract extraction | Multi-vertical document AI | CRE lending |
| Lease abstraction | Yes, with source passages | 215 fields, 40+ doc types | Leases as an input | Yes, 25+ languages | 100+ data points | Not published |
| Human QA step | Analyst review | Yes — expert validation | Approval gates | Not published | Not published | Yes |
| Rent roll | Yes, as-of dated | Live, reconciled | Yes, as input | Not published | Parsing claimed | Yes |
| Statement spreading | Coded and reconciled | Not published | T-12s, payroll, taxes | Not published | Not published | P&L, tax returns |
| Proforma / valuation | Yes, editable | Not published | Automated pro forma | Not published | Not published | Deal sizing only |
| BOV | Yes | Not published | Not published | Not published | BOV agent | Not published |
| Asset classes | Seven CRE types | Not multifamily | MF, self-storage, dev | Any contract | Any document | Lending focus |
| Security cert. | Not published | SOC 2 Type II | Not published | Not published for this product | SOC 2 II, ISO 27001 | Not published |
If lease data accuracy is the problem — Prophia. The deepest published field count in this set, a human QA step, a published 99% accuracy figure, and the only tool here you can put a lease through and judge before speaking to anyone. It is also the only one here whose rent roll reconciles back against your accounting system. It does not do multifamily.
If you are underwriting deals — Crevanta or Cactus. These are the two that carry documents through to a model. Cactus has specific self-storage and industrial modelling; Crevanta covers more asset classes and produces a valuation and a BOV. Cactus publishes no valuation or returns capability.
If your leases are not in English — MRI. 25+ languages including Chinese, Japanese, Korean and Russian is a capability almost nobody else has, and it settles the question on its own for a multinational estate. It publishes no financial modelling of any kind.
If compliance is the gate — V7 Go. SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR and a published EU-only data residency commitment. It is a general document platform with a real real-estate surface rather than a CRE-native tool, which is a trade, not a flaw.
If you are lending — Blooma. The only one built around borrower credit as well as the asset: personal financial statements, schedules of real estate and actual tax return forms, plus post-close portfolio monitoring. It publishes no lease abstraction.
Worth noticing as a group, because it tells you what this category currently is:
See How Crevanta Compares
Every CRE portfolio is different. Request a personalized demo and see exactly how Crevanta handles your document types, property classes, and workflow.